Reflections on the Protests

Like anyone who lives in Israel, I can definitely relate to the protests sweeping the country. The rising cost of living, considering the average Israeli salary, is certainly alarming. Although it’s true that there is a distinctive left-leaning anti-Bibi slant to the growing movement and it’s also true that the protesters have become the darlings of the predominantly left-wing media rather than being vilified and subsequently beaten and imprisoned in the way that young religious youth were beaten and imprisoned as they protested against the Gaza Disengagement a few years ago, there is, nevertheless, a real problem.

To borrow the trinity paradigm from Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”, the “Have-a-Little, Want Mores”, otherwise known as the middles class, are being pushed down the socioeconomic ladder away from the “Haves” and in the direction of the “Have-Nots”. This frightening awareness, and not a true concern about the plight of the poor since the poor have been around for years affording concerned citizens ample opportunities to get involved and help, is what is causing otherwise apathetic Israelis to finally raise their voice in protest.

The real problem with the protests is not the fact that Israelis are finally waking up but rather the belief that the cause of the deteriorating situation is the government. Although it’s true that shifted government policies might be capable of alleviating the situation, the fact is that government policy alone is not a panacea for the deeper social problems that not only plague Israel but plague many western countries as well.

The first of these problems is the growing focus on the “me” as opposed to a genuine concern for others. This can be seen in various ways throughout Israel; for example the growing percentage of secular Israelis shirking army responsibility (in addition to the already high percentage of Haredi men), the low per capita charitable giving amongst Israelis despite the growth in wealth through the years, the continued aggressive behavior on the more and more crowded roads as if no one else existed but “me and my car”, the more than five year lack of concern for the roughly 10,000 Israelis that were forcibly removed from their homes in Gaza and thrown into a life of misery, etc, etc.

One of the leaders of the protests was recently quoted as saying “It’s about changing the entire approach to what the country can do for its people”. Not only does this assume that the source of the problem is the government but also that the government needs to serve us better. This brought to mind the exact opposite quote from JFK’s inaugural address, “Ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country.” In other words, the emphasis should be on collective responsibility and in helping to improve the well-being of others.

This of course is a very basic Jewish message, beautifully expressed by Natan Tzulman in his book (in Hebrew) “Thoughts and Views in Judaism.” In explaining the difference between the western approach to life and the Jewish approach to life, Tzulman says that in the western approach man looks at the world around him in order to understand how he can better utilize the world for his own pleasure and to make his life more enjoyable while in the Jewish approach man studies the world around him in order to understand how he can better contribute in helping to make the world a better place. Based upon this, a large portion of the Jewish state is sadly acting in a very un-Jewish way.

Another problem is the lack in Israel of what is known as “histapkut”, best defined as “contentment with one’s lot”. This trait, which has been widely praised by Jewish sages throughout the ages, means that a person should not only be happy with what he has but that he should happily live within his means. This doesn’t suggest that a person should stop striving to improve his lot but rather this should be tempered by an awareness of what is truly important. In other words, one should clearly know the difference between “needs” and “wants”.

With this in mind I spoke with a protester earlier today in the tent community set up in the center of Jerusalem who said that even if he wanted to take his children on a vacation to Eilat, he couldn’t since it’s simply too expensive. Of course my answer to him was “don’t go.” Although such a trip may be enjoyable, it’s certainly not something that one needs. Unfortunately in this regard Israel has been heavily influenced by the western consumer mentality and the belief that the purchase of more and more “things” – be it the latest iPhone, an American style refrigerator or a vacation trip to Europe – regardless of one’s financial situation, will somehow bring happiness.

There’s also a touch of greed in Israel. Many people charge exorbitant prices since they know they can get away with it. This of course is attached to the first problem since if there was a true concern for others across the board then people would certainly find ways to charge a bit less and still make a profit. This would apply not only to the obvious problem with the soaring price of apartment rentals but even to the outrageous prices charged for many children’s attractions, the frightening prices charged by contractors for apartment renovations, or the outlandish prices charged to families for a simple kibbutz tzimmer (a guesthouse/bed and breakfast). In this light I think of the supermarket king Rami Levi. He’s a smart businessman and makes a hefty profit. At the same time it appears that he has a good heart, regularly charging less than other supermarkets and even drastically reducing prices on certain essential products before Passover, a move that enables many less fortunate families to conduct a proper Passover Seder. Although cynics will claim that his only intention is to attract more customers and thereby increase his revenue, it’s an undeniable fact that many Israelis benefit from his approach.

Bottom line, in order to effect a lasting change in Israel the focus needs to be on correcting these damaging traits. The question is whether the protesters and the rest of the country understand that this, and not government policy, is the real source of the problem. If they don’t, then all the changes in the world will not stop the further deterioration of the society.

This entry was posted in Articles - Ynet, Torah Insights. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Reflections on the Protests

  1. David says:

    Hi Yoel,

    I agree with your perspective, the question now begs on your last paragraph, ” in order to effect a lasting change in Israel the focus needs to be on correcting these damaging traits. The question is whether the protesters and the rest of the country understand that this, and not government policy, is the real source of the problem. If they don’t, then all the changes in the world will not stop the further deterioration of the society.”

    Are we just going to draw important conclusions, without taking initiatives to make a difference, as suggested each in their best talented ability? The ball is in our court, it is easy to blame, and hard to take initiative to impact a true positive change.

    Fast forward X time, look back, and ask yourself, what did you do to make a difference, while all this transpired in-front of our eyes?

    Hint, Education is a start, by visiting those protesters either by their tents or whatever other ideas one has, Educate, setup group classes to convey the point, even if it requires camping out with them to Educate.

    Respectfully,
    David

    • Yoel Meltzer says:

      Hi David,

      Thanks for your thoughtful comments. Personally, I’m always trying to do what I can to influence others (and myself) by constantly writing and talking to people. Education, from every angle, is obviously the key. For this many of us are doing what we can, however limited, to implement real changes here. However, in order to really make changes on the macro level, people with ideas and vision have to roll up their sleeves and get involved, even if it’s dirty, in order to get to the real positions of influence (the political world, the media, academia, etc). There’s no shortcut.

      There’s no simple magic wand solution. Personally I firmly believe in the power of ideas. In other words, ideas (spoken, written, etc) over time are what eventually cause the changes in the physical realm. For that reason I do what I can, however limited, in trying to circulate ideas in order to cause more and more people to wake up and start thinking. It’s painfully slow but it’s something.

      All the best.

      Yoel

  2. Jordan is not Palestine and Jordan is not Israel says:

    Jordan is not Palestine and Jordan is not Israel and Jordan is not the Hashimites. Jordan is not made of 70% Palestinians as you mentioned, Jordan has close to 60% Jordanians whom original roots are of Palestinians. Jordan will not solve Israel’s crime of misplacing the Palestinians, only Israel alone should bear solving their problem and finding them either a place to settle or take them back. Jordan is not an option to solve the Palestinian problem. We Jordanians are revolting against an absolute monarchy and a corrupt regime, that is not constitutional,we need to establish a democratic Jordan and not “Palestine in Jordan”, and will keep the misplaced refugees until the world solve their problem, for now they are in their brother’s homes, but eventually only Israel alone will have to solve their problem, and they themselves would not accept any place as an exchange for their native land that is Palestine.

    The Israelis must understand that the Palestinian problem is not just the problem of finding a home for misplaced refugees nor is to establish a Palestinian state, the Palestinian problem is a Muslim and a human problem, we have holy places that we need to stay under Arab sovereignty in an Arab place. As for Palestinians, they want their native land, and that would not be replaced by any place but what is now occupied lands by Israelis.

    Dr. Mohamed Nezami , Jordan

    • Yoel Meltzer says:

      Mohamed,

      First of all, I wish you well in changing your country from an absolute monarchy to a democratic country.

      Regarding the refugees, are you familiar with the difference between UNRWA and UNHCR and how this is connected to the problem? Do you know how many Arabs lost their homes in 1948? Do you know how long these Arabs were living in these places? Do you know where many of these Arabs came from? Do you know how many Jews lost their homes in Arab countries after 1948? Do you know how long these Jews had been living in such places? Do you know why these refugees were resettled while the Palestinians were not? Do you know when the word “Palestinian” started to be used? Are you familiar with the Partition Plan of 1947? Are you familar with the Mandate Period? Are you familiar with The San Remo Conference? Are you familiar with the homeland that was promised to the Jews? Do you know that this promise was/is anchored in international law? Do you know how Transjordan (then Jordan) was started? Are you familar with British policy in the region from roughly 1920-1948? Do you know what happened to Jewish holy places under Jordanian rule from 1948-1967?

      This is just the tip of the iceberg. Unfortunately most people, even some smart ones, know very little about these and a million other related issues. Thus, without a real understanding of the issues they are fed nonsense, propaganda and lies, which in turn makes it almost impossible to have a real serious discussion about the issues.

      I want peace and stability for the region, for both Jews and Arabs. However, I’m certain that the two-state solution will just lead to the end of Israel.

      If in fact you really understand the issues, I’m more than happy to discuss them.

      Yoel

  3. jack cohen says:

    I think that Mr. Meltzer has great ideas. he also has much knowledge of past history. To this I would like to ad: we Jews are always apologizing for everything. We should be proud and not appeal to the world for sympathy. We just have to move on. For example, when discussing refugees or holocaust, we should maintain that these words are limited to the Jewish experience, viz. the refugees means Jews being forced out of their country of origin and the Holocaust means the Jewish problem in WWII. Similarly, Holy Sites and Shrines mean Jewish Holy Sites and Jewish Shrines. The Arabs usually distort history and facts. They ask for outrageous things, such as returning to pre 67 lines and not building new homes in Judea and Samaria. We must retort with returning to 2000 years ago and always building new homes like all the countries of the world. When Turkey requests an apology we should respond with: yes, you apologize for what you did to our people over the past few centuries. Always turn the tables on others and never concede. The world respects us when we are tough. Not only militarily, but also politically, this is the only way. All the best. Jack

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>